Justin wrote:x2, if only to get a sense of what is actually important. From an engineering standpoint, we use some really neat stuff. For example, a RuffStuff 1.25" heim is rated for 78,000lbs before is starts to deform. That's ridiculous, and I suspect lots of rigs wind up with extra weight because we're overbuilding things.
Digger wrote:The other thing that happens is people replace a bushing or other compliant joint with a rod end thinking that will make the truck stronger, but now the spike loads have increased 4-fold because there is nothing to absorb the impacts and the system as a whole becomes weaker.
I wish more people had your attitude. (you know, actually thinking) We just had to re-design a track bar because the customer didn't think it "looked" heavy duty enough and therefore would not sell well. So what did we do? We made it bigger but had to lower the material grade to manufacture it, resulting in exactly the same strength it had before, but now it's heavier.![]()
And this is why I drink.
Digger wrote:One thing to keep in mind regarding bushings and their bolts, the bolt should not be considered to be stressed in sheer. What keeps in the bushing in place is the friction between the inner metal and the bracket as a result of the compression forces created by the bolt. This is why some bushings are serrated on their ends, so that they mechanically key into the bracket, assisting the friction forces.
Justin wrote:That 1" shank is an odd size that I can't find a bung for.
ZOSO wrote:Digger, Im gonna pick your brain about radius arms so be prepared for some PM's.....
Gunnibronco wrote:I need to decide if I want to use a Metalcloak joint on the frame end of my trackbar. I'm still using the stock poly bushing on the axle side. I have an extra new Ruffstuff heim & bung I was going to use, when lengthen my track bar. But I really would like to put a bushing back in. We'll see.
Digger wrote:If everything else in your front end is tight, you should be okay. With front track bars you have to be careful not to drop the "spring rate" of the track bar assembly too far because you could induce death wobble. If you look at OE track bars, they tend to run small, high rate bushings, or a combination of a small bushing and a cross-axis ball joint.
Digger wrote:Justin wrote:x2, if only to get a sense of what is actually important. From an engineering standpoint, we use some really neat stuff. For example, a RuffStuff 1.25" heim is rated for 78,000lbs before is starts to deform. That's ridiculous, and I suspect lots of rigs wind up with extra weight because we're overbuilding things.
The other thing that happens is people replace a bushing or other compliant joint with a rod end thinking that will make the truck stronger, but now the spike loads have increased 4-fold because there is nothing to absorb the impacts and the system as a whole becomes weaker.
:
Digger wrote:9/16"(14mm) is common for track bar bolts are on vehicles weighing 4000-5500lbs. The new Dodge 1-tons are up to 18mm.
One thing to keep in mind regarding bushings and their bolts, the bolt should not be considered to be stressed in sheer. What keeps in the bushing in place is the friction between the inner metal and the bracket as a result of the compression forces created by the bolt. This is why some bushings are serrated on their ends, so that they mechanically key into the bracket, assisting the friction forces.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests