Hydroboost issues

Get answers to Bronco-related technical issues.
Post Reply
User avatar
Eck
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 2462
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm

Hydroboost issues

Post by Eck »

So I got everything bolted up and fired it up. One of the bolts that attached the clocking bracket to the HB stripped out when I pushed in the pedal which then led to the ΓÇ£star clipΓÇ¥ and plunger spring to pop out. IΓÇÖve gotten the bracket, bolts and MC all disconnected but now the piston and pedal is stuck in the down position.

If I reopen the hydroboost will it release pressure and allow the piston to come back up so I can reinstall the spring and plunger? Or is this indicating something else is going on? IΓÇÖm VERY close to buying a hydroboost from a parts store with a lifetime warranty...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
User avatar
phyler
CCB Admin
Posts: 1231
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:41 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by phyler »

I saw a post on this issue when I was looking for the rebuild info. There is something out of place. I'll look for the article.

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
1975 Ranger Edition that I've had longer than I've been without it.

OG
User avatar
Eck
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 2462
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by Eck »

Took the hydroboost apart again and got everything installed again. I did not spend a ton of time bleeding the system but it seems like IΓÇÖve fixed the issues I was having. Fluid level doesnΓÇÖt seem to be going down anymore and I donΓÇÖt see any foaming or bubbles in the fluid.

However- I have two things going on that I could use some advise on.

1. The pedal rebound is pretty slow.

2. The brakes donΓÇÖt work well. When I first installed before pulling it for the leak and new clocking bracket, the brakes locked up immediately when I put the pedal to the floor. Now the seem to just sort of engage. The new bracket is 1/2ΓÇ¥ instead of the 1/8ΓÇ¥ that was on there previously.

Do I need to lengthen the pushrod that goes from the HB to the brake pedal? Or is there another adjustment that needs to be made to make the throw further now that IΓÇÖve added 1/2ΓÇ¥ of space between the hydroboost and master cylinder?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
User avatar
Kinder
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 9:03 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by Kinder »

Is the spacer between the MC and the booster? If yes then youΓÇÖll likely need to add something to take up the space that was created. Lengthening the rod from the pedal to the booster wonΓÇÖt solve this problem since itΓÇÖs the rod out of the booster that isnΓÇÖt engaging the MC correctly. IΓÇÖm not sure if there is an off the shelf solution, IΓÇÖll look for something to link to.
Best to Date MPG: 26.6
User avatar
Eck
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 2462
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by Eck »

Kinder wrote:Is the spacer between the MC and the booster? If yes then youΓÇÖll likely need to add something to take up the space that was created. Lengthening the rod from the pedal to the booster wonΓÇÖt solve this problem since itΓÇÖs the rod out of the booster that isnΓÇÖt engaging the MC correctly. IΓÇÖm not sure if there is an off the shelf solution, IΓÇÖll look for something to link to.
Correct and that was my assumption as well. The MC I have had one that you added for power brakes vs manual brakes but when I added the 1/2ΓÇ¥ spacer- it obviously created a 1/2ΓÇ¥ lag. I havenΓÇÖt been able to find anything off the shelf yet and it seems like the clocking bracket is a fairly common thing people are doing so IΓÇÖm curious. Does it make more sense to have a longer rod on the hydroboost side or the master cylinder side?

Any thoughts on why the pedal rebound is so slow?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by Justin »

The pushrod coming out of the hydroboos will need to be lengthened to correctly engage the back of the M/C. If I remember correctly, this is where I got my custom longer pushrod:

http://www.vancopbs.com/category_s/168.htm

Any local machine shop could make one easily, though. I'd get that in and see if you still have rebound issues. I'm wondering if the hydroboost partially relies on pressure from the M/C to return the brake pedal. Could also just be trapped air. Took a long time for mine to fully bleed when I did the swap. Either way, glad you're making progress.
User avatar
Eck
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 2462
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by Eck »

So I ended up making a longer rod that goes in the Master Cylinder out of some 1/2 steel rod. The pedal is now very stiff and IΓÇÖm able to lock up the brakes if I get on them.

I opted this route as it seemed like a lot less hassle than dealing on the hydroboost side. Also cost $8 for a 3ft rod.

IΓÇÖd be interested to have someone compare mine to theirs as IΓÇÖm a little surprised the Hydroboost doesnΓÇÖt seem to give me the ΓÇ£easeΓÇ¥ I was expecting. I still feel like IΓÇÖve gotta give it some good muscle to lock it up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by Justin »

You're welcome to swing by and drive mine. My pedal isn't super stiff, like manual brakes. It gets firm once it loads up, but there's still some hydraulic-y mush in it. Not a ton of feel compared to the little zippy cars I usually drive.
User avatar
ZOSO
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3910
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:58 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by ZOSO »

Interesting about the hard pedal. My buddies jeep has the same hard pedal where my bronco is really soft.
Rob

74 Ranger EFI351w, 4r70w, ARB 5.13 9in, ARB 5.13D44, and a bunch of other goodies. Best of all the family memories.

04 Mustang Cobra, KenneBell 2.2 feeding a lot of boost on E85. Tire shredding machine

New project: 77 Bronco Ranger, body work and more body work.

Very little left of a 72 durango tan explorer sport
User avatar
phyler
CCB Admin
Posts: 1231
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:41 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by phyler »

Do you know what size bore your master cylinder has? That can affect pedal feel.

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
1975 Ranger Edition that I've had longer than I've been without it.

OG
User avatar
Eck
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 2462
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by Eck »

phyler wrote:Do you know what size bore your master cylinder has? That can affect pedal feel.

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
Looks to be a 1ΓÇ¥ bore.

This is what I bought. https://swperformanceparts.com/product/ ... B8QAvD_BwE


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
User avatar
phyler
CCB Admin
Posts: 1231
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:41 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by phyler »

Eck wrote:
phyler wrote:Do you know what size bore your master cylinder has? That can affect pedal feel.

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
Looks to be a 1ΓÇ¥ bore.

This is what I bought. https://swperformanceparts.com/product/ ... B8QAvD_BwE


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wouldn't think that would be super stiff then. I've heard of it happening with the 1.25" bore.

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
1975 Ranger Edition that I've had longer than I've been without it.

OG
User avatar
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4077
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by Gunnibronco »

My original hboost had a very stiff/touchy pedal that locked up the brakes easily. I swapped from F150 calipers to the Tbird calipers to pull my bias forward and the pedal got significantly softer. It's a function of master cylinder, caliper, and rear wheel cylinder volume. I'm running the 2000ish Mustang m/c(1") Tbird calipers and 79 F150/Bronco rear brakes.

Sent from my E6910 using Tapatalk
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." ΓÇô Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
User avatar
landshark
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 3942
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:16 pm

Hydroboost issues

Post by landshark »

My pedal is pretty stiff and easily locks up all four, but always fronts first. I donΓÇÖt have any problems with the way the brakes work and you get used to it very quickly, itΓÇÖs nice on the trail since you donΓÇÖt have to ride the pedal. Iam using a proportion valve and the corvette master cylinder. My pedal rebound is instant.

I would suggest driving it for a while once you get the air out.
1976 Bronco "Green, Yellow, whatever", 1969 Bronco "Red", 1972 Bronco Stocker "Kind of Blue/Grayish"
User avatar
Eck
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 2462
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by Eck »

Thanks for all the feedback. I will drive it a bit and make sure all the air is out and see how it feels before making any tweeks. I haven't driven off my street and any faster than 30 mph so it could be much different once I actually give it a true road test.
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
User avatar
Eck
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 2462
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by Eck »

Took it for a short drive and the brakes started to engage without pressing in the pedal. My initial guess is that the system pressurized more after driving it and started to engage the master cylinder. My plan is to grind down the pin I put into the MC a little more until that doesnΓÇÖt happen.

On another note, my engine runs like crap. I had cut and made my own spark plug wires while I was doing the hydroboost so I need to check and test that all of them are working properly- and hopefully that will be the reason and an easy enough fix.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
User avatar
Eck
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 2462
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Hydroboost issues

Post by Eck »

I am a little perplexed. I am trying to dial in the Hydroboost to Master Cylinder engagement and I made a bullet to go into the Master Cylinder to take up the 1/2" of the spacer I installed. I had the truck propped up in the front and was able to spin the front tires freely so I took it for a test drive. After a short time, it seemed as though the brakes were engaging without depressing the brake pedal- making me think that maybe the hydraulic system is pressurizing and causing the rod from the hydroboost to engage the master cylinder. When I got back from the test drive, the front driver brake was smoking.

I propped the front end back up and turned the Bronco on and depressed the brake pedal about 20 times to try to pressurize the system again but the front tires still move freely. I am not sure how to determine how much to shorten the MC bullet since I can't seem to replicate the issue on jack stands.

Any advice?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
User avatar
Kinder
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 9:03 pm

Hydroboost issues

Post by Kinder »

A quick search yields a thread on CB.com. It looks like there needs to be a slight gap b/t the hydrobooster rod and the point of engagement on the back of the master. 1/16 inch is referenced, the OP just used washers. IΓÇÖd say washers are a good starting point so the distance can be changed easily, then when you find the space needed take it out of the rod length.

https://classicbroncos.com/forums/showt ... p?t=270970
Best to Date MPG: 26.6
Post Reply