One step forward, two steps back.

Post Reply
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4901
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm

One step forward, two steps back.

Post by akaFrankCastle »

So, I pretty much got my hydroboost issues figured out. Would love to take her out for a test drive and confirm that. Only one problem with that. The Bronco won't start. Ran down just about every inch of wiring to figure out what the issue was and came up with one conclusion: my wiring is bad. Can't ever recall picking up a wiring harness and having it nearly disintegrate in my hand before.

So, I'm in the market for a complete, new wiring harness and I need some recommendations. I'm leaning more towards the Centech harness right now, mostly due to price. Toying with the idea of EFI, down the road (maybe this winter) but it is a big IF for now. No real whacky additions on the truck. Pretty much a standard Bronco with a stereo, fog lamps, and 1-2 accessories.

Let's slug it out here. Painless versus Centech. Who will win my money?
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
User avatar
Rox Crusher
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 3980
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 4:36 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by Rox Crusher »

I tend to go overboard............................so Painless would be my choice.
1977 Sport, 351w OBDII EFI motor, 4R70W auto, 4:88 gears, ARB lockers, 3.5" suspension, 33" tires.
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4901
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by akaFrankCastle »

Rox Crusher wrote:I tend to go overboard............................so Painless would be my choice.


I do like that Painless claims to have had much Bronco owner input in to the creation of the harness.

So who has installed a harness recently?
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by Justin »

I did a Centech earlier this year. I'm really happy with it-my truck fired right up the first time I tried to start it and everything worked great. The instructions with the Painless are better and it has more empty circuits to wire stuff to. I think the Centech is better bang for the buck. The other major perk with the Centech is that it is already loomed. Saved me a ton of work. Finally, their customer service is really good. I called a couple of weeks ago when my headlights stopped working thinking it was the headlight switch. They stayed on the phone with me to walk me through diagnosing it, then sent me a new high beam switch for free even after I told them it was my extra-flexy floorboard that caused it to break. I offered to pay and they said no. All told, it probably took me 15 hours to install. If you do it, spend $30 on the special tool to crimp the connectors they use. Would have saved me at least an hour of fiddling around.
User avatar
ZOSO
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3910
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:58 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by ZOSO »

+1 for the centech kit. Installed it in my dads 74 and it was great. Working with the painless on chads I didn't like that it wasn't loomed. I do like all the extra circuits to it tho.
Rob

74 Ranger EFI351w, 4r70w, ARB 5.13 9in, ARB 5.13D44, and a bunch of other goodies. Best of all the family memories.

04 Mustang Cobra, KenneBell 2.2 feeding a lot of boost on E85. Tire shredding machine

New project: 77 Bronco Ranger, body work and more body work.

Very little left of a 72 durango tan explorer sport
User avatar
Entourage
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 3275
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:45 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by Entourage »

I spent a lot of time looming my Painless. You can buy the $100.00 Painless loom kit but that puts it WAY more than the Centec. I have a H4 headlight harness, off road lights, stereo, and cigaratte lighter hooked up to mine - not sure what other circuits you would put in but there are still 4 or 5 open circuits. I just taped them off and will likely never use them again. My Painless came with my truck, but if I was buying new, it would be a Centec.
"I truly believe that good will outweigh evil, but there won't be peace on earth until the power of love overcomes the love of power" - Jimi Hendrix
User avatar
sbolt19
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 740
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:04 am

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by sbolt19 »

I put the Centech in about 11 years ago and it was a pain in the ass because the directions were vague. I hope that they have since updated them and tried to install the harness using the directions, because before, it was about 1/2 guesswork and 1/2 defined instruction. Past that, overall, it is a nice harness with straight forward harness setup. If you are going to do the EFI, don't worry about which company you go with, but I would get the RJM harness for the EFI. It is by far the nicest EFI harness out there.
User avatar
Jesus_man
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 5988
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:36 am

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by Jesus_man »

Boy, new wiring harness almost demands you switch to EFI... Hate to spend money twice. I would think long and hard about going to EFI.

J.D.
1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow.
http://www.ucora.org
User avatar
Booger
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:55 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by Booger »

Jesus_man wrote:Boy, new wiring harness almost demands you switch to EFI... Hate to spend money twice. I would think long and hard about going to EFI.

J.D.

Only thing is you are still going to need a good harness to get power to all the other stuff. My Centech really wasn't to be. We had one issue with a switched red wire but one quick call to Centech and they had me fixed in no time. One thing I did was add weather-pak ends to all the marker light wires as well. Expensive but well worth it IMO. Didn't like crimping wires with butt connectors after all the work Zoso did getting the wiring laid out and installed.
Bob - Turning hydrocarbons into noise since 1970

Spiritual owner of the now Zoso mobile (1974 Bronco Ranger - EFI 351W-4R70W-ARB front and rear-STC softtop- High Country hood-3 1/2" WH lift- Cross inboard rear shock mnt- Duffs bumpers- Warn 8274- 33's- Cheby disc conversion)
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by Justin »

Not sure when you did yours, but mine came with only weather-pak connectors.
User avatar
plumbdoctor
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 568
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:17 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by plumbdoctor »

IMO, the Centech is easier to install ( plus a bit cheaper )
Your sh!* is my bread and butter!
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4901
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by akaFrankCastle »

Jesus_man wrote:Boy, new wiring harness almost demands you switch to EFI... Hate to spend money twice. I would think long and hard about going to EFI.

J.D.


Brother, I've got nowhere near enough time or money right now to go EFI. Time being the critical factor. EFI will have to wait until this winter, at best.
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
User avatar
Jesus_man
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 5988
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:36 am

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by Jesus_man »

Maybe whomever you talk to about buying one, you might mention that EFI is in the future and hopefully they can make what you have expandable. Really, I am not good at wiring and have never installed a new harness. My bronco needs one bad, but am afraid I'll never get it running again! So I fix as I go along. That being said, I am not sure the differences between a carb'd harness and EFI and if you can expand one into the other?? Just assuming it can be done.

J.D.
1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow.
http://www.ucora.org
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by Justin »

Phil can probably do a better job of explaining this, but my understanding is that the wiring part of the EFI harness just taps into the existing harness in one or two locations. Shouldn't make much of a difference in a harness replacement.
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4901
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by akaFrankCastle »

I'm thinking pretty seriously about picking up a harness this month or early next. If anyone else is potentially in the market, by all means chime in here. Enough buyers and we might be able to pull a discounted price with a mass buy.
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
haulasswithclass
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:03 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by haulasswithclass »

maybe intrested in a harness let me know
User avatar
Dukietown
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 523
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:24 am

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by Dukietown »

May be interested as well, especially if we set up a tech day to go through an install. Will need to do some research on how to tie it in to my TBI setup first.
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4901
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm

Re: One step forward, two steps back.

Post by akaFrankCastle »

Too bad my wiring didn't go wonky on me last month. Painless had a 100.00 rebate going on. banghead
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
Post Reply