Why Wouldn't I Want To Try This

Get answers to Bronco-related technical issues.
Post Reply
75DBE
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 7:37 am

Why Wouldn't I Want To Try This

Post by 75DBE »

Ok, so I am reading this article:

http://www.stangtv.com/tech-stories/eng ... d/?print=1

This alll started from another thread here on which way to go with a new engine for someones Bronco. The gist of the first article that I read -- titled Small Block Ford Reality -- is that it was a waste of time and effort trying to build up a 302 engine and that starting with a 351W engine gave you by far the best bag for your buck. The article above talks about taking a good 351W block and building up an inexpensive (although all is relative) 408ci Small Block Ford engine that puts out 550 HP.

If the weight of the engine is about the same -- and I think it should be -- why don't we see more 408 engines in Broncos -- or other cars for that matter?

Thoughts?
Now with disk brakes, has turned into my sons daily driver while he is home on Christmas break.
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4901
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm

Re: Why Wouldn't I Want To Try This

Post by akaFrankCastle »

Without reading the article...
My guess is two reasons.
1) Dropping a 408 into a Bronco is pretty much going to kill any hopes of keeping your fuel economy in the double digits.
2) A 408 will pretty much be overkill for a Bronco. 550HP is pretty cool in a Mustang or other hot rod type vehicle. But, practically speaking, way more than you would ever need in one of our trucks.

Now, that's not to say I wouldn't want 550. But I'm more concerned with MPGs and reliability.
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
75DBE
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 319
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 7:37 am

Re: Why Wouldn't I Want To Try This

Post by 75DBE »

Hey!

I'm thinking the next Bandimere Pinks ALL Out all the way!

HAH!
Now with disk brakes, has turned into my sons daily driver while he is home on Christmas break.
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4901
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm

Re: Why Wouldn't I Want To Try This

Post by akaFrankCastle »

Budget build says the article. Some very quick math just produced a parts cost of just over 3000 before any machine work.

Heads: 1600 (before porting)
Cam: 250+
Pushrods: 150+
Pistons: 500+
Rockers: 250+
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
Post Reply