shocks

Get answers to Bronco-related technical issues.
Post Reply
User avatar
aaah1
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:34 pm

shocks

Post by aaah1 »

Im looking to replace my blown rancho rs5000 shocks I have up front on the bronco. I never thought the 5000 where anything fancy, but they worked. Im in between the bilstein 5100 and the rancho 9000xl. I like the bilsteins since they are Bilsteins, and pull more travel. The ranchos have a bigger body, and are selectable which would be sweet. Anybody have experience on either, or other suggestions.
My friends are pulling for the Billsteins.
76 bronco, 351W, Zf, 6in of lift, 35x12.5 bfg all terrains
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4901
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm

Re: shocks

Post by akaFrankCastle »

Your friends are on to something. I've still got crappy Ranchos on the truck that were installed waaaaaay back before I bought it. However, I just put Bilsteins on the Super Duty and love them. When I get around to lifting again, or replacing the shocks (whichever comes first), I'll be throwing Bilsteins under it.
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
User avatar
Colorado75bronc
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 996
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:13 pm

Re: shocks

Post by Colorado75bronc »

I rec bilstiens
75' bronco, 302, carb'd for now, i'm gathering parts for efi, 3g alternator, saginaw pump, 4x4x2 box, fw hp44, fw 9", N.P. 435 w/ gearbanger shifter, twin stick'd dana 20, 2" BL, 5.5" wildhorses lift, and 35" km2's
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm

Re: shocks

Post by Justin »

x3. Adjustavility is nice, but overrated unless you're racing. Get a properly valved shock and you're set. The travel will make a bigger difference. What's your setup?
User avatar
aaah1
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:34 pm

Re: shocks

Post by aaah1 »

Justin wrote:x3. Adjustavility is nice, but overrated unless you're racing. Get a properly valved shock and you're set. The travel will make a bigger difference. What's your setup?


about 4in of lift with coils
76 bronco, 351W, Zf, 6in of lift, 35x12.5 bfg all terrains
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm

Re: shocks

Post by Justin »

Stock shock mounts? If so, you'll be a little more limited on shock choices. If you're doing shocks anyway, you may want to upgrade to a set of F-250 towers. You'll upgrade to a more common mounts style and they're an inch or two longer, giving you even more shock travel. The best part is that they're about $17 each at your local Ford dealership. Part number E5TZ 18183A. The only downer is that you'll need a competent welder for installation if you aren't one. Hoops are sweet and will give you another inch or so of travel beyond what the 250 mounts do, but you'll spend a chunk more coin.
User avatar
sbolt19
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 740
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:04 am

Re: shocks

Post by sbolt19 »

Just my .02 on the Ranchos. The 9000s are nice, and I have run them for about 3 years now, but if I had it to do over again, I'd do Bilstiens. The only thing that makes the Ranchos comparable is that you have the option to hook them up to air and remotely adjust them, which I haven't done. My dad has the 9000s on his 3/4 ton PU truck & hooked up the remote. Unless he has a load in the back, they run a little rough or he has to make them real soft. The problem with them being soft is that you pick up a ton of body roll. I keep mine set at 1 notch stiffer than mid way.
User avatar
aaah1
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:34 pm

Re: shocks

Post by aaah1 »

Justin wrote:Stock shock mounts? If so, you'll be a little more limited on shock choices. If you're doing shocks anyway, you may want to upgrade to a set of F-250 towers. You'll upgrade to a more common mounts style and they're an inch or two longer, giving you even more shock travel. The best part is that they're about $17 each at your local Ford dealership. Part number E5TZ 18183A. The only downer is that you'll need a competent welder for installation if you aren't one. Hoops are sweet and will give you another inch or so of travel beyond what the 250 mounts do, but you'll spend a chunk more coin.


Im not sure I dont think i have ever seen stock bronco mounts. I bought this bronco with the lift so I do not really know much about it. It has stemm for the top shock mount which makes life difficult to find shocks since most seem to be double Eyes. You got me thinking about roll hoops though since I have access to fair amount chromoly tubing and a bender. So it would free and just take some time. I am also a pretty competent welder.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
76 bronco, 351W, Zf, 6in of lift, 35x12.5 bfg all terrains
User avatar
aaah1
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:34 pm

Re: shocks

Post by aaah1 »

I think I am going with Billsteins 5100. You cant really go wrong with Billstein, plus I do love lifetime warrantys. ON like my 6th free power steering pump from O'Reillys.
76 bronco, 351W, Zf, 6in of lift, 35x12.5 bfg all terrains
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm

Re: shocks

Post by Justin »

Those are the stock mounts. They work great, just harder to source high-end shocks for. The 5100s are a great choice if you're sticking with stock mounts. Otherwise I'd suggest looking at the 5150's. They're not much more and add an integrated external reservoir to the mix. I'm tempted to go with 7100s on mine, but I'm not sure I can rationalize the extra $$ for the kind of driving/trail running I do.
User avatar
Jesus_man
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 5988
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:36 am

Re: shocks

Post by Jesus_man »

I don't think you could go wrong with your choices, but seems like leaning towards the Bilsteins is the way I'd go too.

As for the mounts, if you want to get into serious off-roading, you want as much travel as possible, so each time you get a chance to upgrade, make the smart choice and go as big as you can. If you can weld and have the tools/materials etc to fab your own, I'd look into that. Tuck those hoops up as high as you can. Also note that if you have not braced your frame at the steering box, now would be a good time.

However, if you're cruising around town and doing some mild off-roading, then you'd be better served to get F-250 towers.

And if I had a rig as nice as yours, I'd do the latter. But either way, I'd try to get a setup where your shocks have eyes on both ends. Then you'll need to measure compression and extension to get the right shock.

J.D.
1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow.
http://www.ucora.org
User avatar
crawlercreations
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 8:36 pm

Re: shocks

Post by crawlercreations »

One thing not mentioned yet...get new springs! Those look like old rancho springs, stiff as hell! No shock out there will make up for the ride quality of those springs.
There is a fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"
Post Reply