GT40P heads/Explorer upper and lower intake: 200.00 COS

Please post prices in your ad and delete or post up when your items are sold.
Post Reply
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4901
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm

GT40P heads/Explorer upper and lower intake: 200.00 COS

Post by akaFrankCastle »

My buddy who does the port work is about to finish his move to NC. He has a set of assembled, not ported, GT40P heads and an Exploder upper and lower intake manifold in storage that he doesn't want to haul to NC.

Anyone interested?
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
User avatar
mickphatmac
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 1810
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:26 am

Re: GT40P heads/Explorer upper and lower intake: 200.00 COS

Post by mickphatmac »

Are these the "good ones" that you would consider to be the one to get if you were doing an efi conversion?
1968 3.5" Lift on 31's Front serpentine belt ViperBuilt 4x4x2 PS C4 '66 Speedo '66 Horn Button- STROPPE goodies: Steering Wheel, Roll Bar, Cactus Smasher
SOLD :(1972 Explorer Sport - '66 Eyebrow Grill - '66 Speedometer - Stroppe Steering Wheel - Stroppe RollBar - ViperBuilt C4
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 4901
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm

Re: GT40P heads/Explorer upper and lower intake: 200.00 COS

Post by akaFrankCastle »

mickphatmac wrote:Are these the "good ones" that you would consider to be the one to get if you were doing an efi conversion?


They are GT40Ps so they have a smaller combustion chamber than GT40s. This should translate to a very modest increase in HP over GT40s. However, they will require Bronco Hut headers to work due to spark plug angle.

Personally, I chose to go with GT40s for the following reasons.
1) I got a set of ported heads for free.
2) Even without the free heads, I was willing to sacrifice a little HP to save money on new headers. Mostly because I'm a cheap S.O.B.
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
User avatar
mickphatmac
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 1810
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:26 am

Re: GT40P heads/Explorer upper and lower intake: 200.00 COS

Post by mickphatmac »

Thanks for the mini tutorial. I know there is a lot more to it (efi) but this looks like a good start...I'm cheap too! Being a cheapskate means the Header thing would kill it for me.
Thanks
1968 3.5" Lift on 31's Front serpentine belt ViperBuilt 4x4x2 PS C4 '66 Speedo '66 Horn Button- STROPPE goodies: Steering Wheel, Roll Bar, Cactus Smasher
SOLD :(1972 Explorer Sport - '66 Eyebrow Grill - '66 Speedometer - Stroppe Steering Wheel - Stroppe RollBar - ViperBuilt C4
valentino
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:35 am

Re: GT40P heads/Explorer upper and lower intake: 200.00 COS

Post by valentino »

If your efi is a h.o motor you will need to replace the springs on gt40p heads but not the gt40 ones.I am waiting for some one to post some gt40's
Post Reply