EFI intakes

Get answers to Bronco-related technical issues.

EFI intakes

Postby Justin » Tue Feb 02, 2016 10:36 am

After shopping around a little for EFI intakes I'm seeing crazy prices for 5.8L GT40 lowers. How does the GT40 setup compare to the Mustang intake? There are loads of 5.8L conversions lowers out there that appear to mate to the mustang upper.

Update: I may have a line on both a cast iron GT40 lower and an Edelbrock mustang style upper and lower. The Edelbrock strikes me as the better option for similar money, correct?
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 6198
Images: 0
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Location: Lakewood

Re: EFI intakes

Postby landshark » Tue Feb 02, 2016 11:21 am

From what I have read the round staggered gt40 setup flows better and the explorer intake has slightly longer runners for better torque.

I just picked up a lower 351w gt40 intake off corral.net for a decent price. Half of what eBay wants
1976 Bronco "Green, Yellow, whatever", 1969 Bronco "Red", 1972 Bronco Stocker "Kind of Blue/Grayish"
User avatar
landshark
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 3942
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Denver, Wash Park Area

EFI intakes

Postby landshark » Tue Feb 02, 2016 11:23 am

I think the cast iron gt40 lowers were used in marine applications but I could be mistaken. There are differences in them with the others but don't think the differences were substantial. They tend to be cheaper too.

You might have already seen this.

http://www.fiveohinfo.com/performance/g ... e-faq.html
1976 Bronco "Green, Yellow, whatever", 1969 Bronco "Red", 1972 Bronco Stocker "Kind of Blue/Grayish"
User avatar
landshark
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 3942
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Denver, Wash Park Area

Re: EFI intakes

Postby akaFrankCastle » Tue Feb 02, 2016 12:15 pm

Are you running a body lift or do you plan to?
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4901
Images: 0
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: EFI intakes

Postby Justin » Tue Feb 02, 2016 12:20 pm

2" is on the truck.
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 6198
Images: 0
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Location: Lakewood

Re: EFI intakes

Postby akaFrankCastle » Tue Feb 02, 2016 12:25 pm

Sounds like you'd be good with either system you chose. Being that is the case, I would go for the lightest and most economical.
Stroppe'd
1972 Sport, 302, 3 speed with old school Duff floor shifter, T shift Dana 20 with JB Fab twin stick, 4.11 gears with Trac-loc, Lincoln hydroboost, Chevy disc conversion, WH gas lift gate shock kit, 33" Duratrac tires on slots and about 2.5" of lift, Stroppe installed: bumper braces, dual shocks on all four corners, GM power steering, trans cooler mount, auto shift column, rollbar.

The Terrible One
1972 Sport uncut, 302, C4 with 1974 column , T shift Dana 20, 3.50 gears w/ limited slip, 1966 U13 Roadster kick panel, and factory power steering.

1973 Stroppe Baja project
User avatar
akaFrankCastle
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4901
Images: 0
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:25 pm
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: EFI intakes

Postby sykanr0ng » Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:02 pm

akaFrankCastle wrote:Sounds like you'd be good with either system you chose. Being that is the case, I would go for the lightest and most economical.


For the 351W GT40 lower the lightest is the aluminum, and the most economical is the cast iron.

So your choice is lightest OR most economical.



The cast iron were used for boats, back before all the boat makers went to Chev. engines
"You say overkill like it's a bad thing."
User avatar
sykanr0ng
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:46 am
Location: Greeley, CO

Re: EFI intakes

Postby cpldavis37 » Thu Feb 04, 2016 5:50 am

The gt 40 lower is the expensive part. The explorer upper is cheap from a junk yard. My project has been at a standstill since buying all the necessary parts. With the intake, heads, 351 roller block, and Explorer fuel injection parts I have 1500 invested and I still need to rebuild the engine. (Coming very soon)

I found my gt 40 lower on ebay. I got it for around 400 with shipping. I am told that was a good deal. The cast gt 40 came on marine motors. Aluminum came from lightnings and the mustang cobra "R".
TJ
"Everyone suspects himself of at least one of the cardinal virtues, and this is mine: I am one of the few honest people I have ever known."
F. Scott Fitzgerald
1974 Ford Bronco 3 1/2 inch James Duff lift ,2 inch body lift, 351w Explorer EFI, Viper built c4, Viper built Dana 20 with wildhorses twin stick, Kinder built Dana 44 with 4.56 gears disc brakes aussie locker and knuckle over conversion, Kinder built 9 inch with grizzly locker 31 spline axles and 4.56 gear
User avatar
cpldavis37
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 357
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 6:45 pm
Location: Thornton, Co


Return to General 4x4 Technical

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests