return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
- Gunnibronco
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
Since I'm not putting my aux tank back into my truck, I have an extra return line available. I've read some people don't like running the EFI return line into the accumulator, because it puts hot gas back into your feed. I thought I could run my return line directly to the tank, and also the line out of the accumulator to the tank.
But I was wondering if the HP pump could pull more than the LP pump could push. Therefore needing some of the returned fuel to make up the difference.
Thoughts? Does anyone know if anyone has done this set up with success? I don't want to cause a problem with a system that already seems to work well.
But I was wondering if the HP pump could pull more than the LP pump could push. Therefore needing some of the returned fuel to make up the difference.
Thoughts? Does anyone know if anyone has done this set up with success? I don't want to cause a problem with a system that already seems to work well.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." ΓÇô Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
- Viperwolf1
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 9:37 pm
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
The HP pump can flow more than a LP pump.
- Gunnibronco
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
Well, in that case I'll just leave it installed with the return line through the accumulator.
Thanks
Thanks
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." ΓÇô Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
- RJLougee
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 215
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 12:40 pm
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
Viperwolf1 wrote:The HP pump can flow more than a LP pump.
Yes, but that is not the same statement as "depends on the LP pump",which is what I would say.
I never run an accumulator, it's a band-aid, like a steering damper.
First choice is to run an in-tank pump, with an in-tank return line.
2nd choice is to run the stock tank, with a Holley Red LP pump, to the Bosch 2000 HP pump, and the return goes straight back to the tank.
It's also important to remember filters between the tank and LP pump, and another one between the HP and rails. If you're running AN lines, there are some interesting/inexpensive options I've been exploring lately.
AND>>>>> it depends on where you drive, how, when, etc... As well as 5.0 vs. 5.8. roller vs. not, etc...
HTH, Joe
'70 Bronco, MAF 5.0, NP435, D44/9", 4.10s, 33" MT/Rs, PS/PB
'71 Bronco, HP D60, Hi-9, 5.38/ARBs, 101" WB, 408 Stroker, AOD, Atlas, 40" MT/Rs, PiMP EFI.
'78 F150 SWB/Stepside/4WD, 351W/4R100/NP205, 35" KM2s, under const...
'81 Coachman Caper XL MH, 4WD, EFI 460/ZF/BW1356, D44/Sterling, 4.10s/35s, under const...
'83 Bronco, D60/Sterling, 5.13/ARBs, MAF EFI 351W/ZF/BW1356, 37" MT/Rs.
'12 Buggy, HPD60, Hi-9, 4.10s, Explorer 5.0, Atlas 4-speed, my chassis, EB skins.
And the latest project is a '99 Ranger Extra-Cab, custom frame/tube work, on 40s...
'71 Bronco, HP D60, Hi-9, 5.38/ARBs, 101" WB, 408 Stroker, AOD, Atlas, 40" MT/Rs, PiMP EFI.
'78 F150 SWB/Stepside/4WD, 351W/4R100/NP205, 35" KM2s, under const...
'81 Coachman Caper XL MH, 4WD, EFI 460/ZF/BW1356, D44/Sterling, 4.10s/35s, under const...
'83 Bronco, D60/Sterling, 5.13/ARBs, MAF EFI 351W/ZF/BW1356, 37" MT/Rs.
'12 Buggy, HPD60, Hi-9, 4.10s, Explorer 5.0, Atlas 4-speed, my chassis, EB skins.
And the latest project is a '99 Ranger Extra-Cab, custom frame/tube work, on 40s...
- Gunnibronco
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
Thanks,
I've been running a LP pump (1st no name BCB pump, now Carter), accumulator, and E2000 HP pump, since I installed my EFI.
I know an accumulator is not necessary, but since its already installed, I figure it doesn't hurt. I've never had any fuel related issues, except all the junk from a new tank clogging up the preLP filter. I also like that the accumulator acts as a second fuel filter.
I'm interested in fuel line options, but for another upcoming build. I'm running mostly steel lines on this truck, with rubber fuel lines (EFI rated where necessary) & hose clamps. It works, but isn't super attractive.
I've been running a LP pump (1st no name BCB pump, now Carter), accumulator, and E2000 HP pump, since I installed my EFI.
I know an accumulator is not necessary, but since its already installed, I figure it doesn't hurt. I've never had any fuel related issues, except all the junk from a new tank clogging up the preLP filter. I also like that the accumulator acts as a second fuel filter.
I'm interested in fuel line options, but for another upcoming build. I'm running mostly steel lines on this truck, with rubber fuel lines (EFI rated where necessary) & hose clamps. It works, but isn't super attractive.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." ΓÇô Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
- Gunnibronco
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
I've been living on the edge, without a filter post HP pump.
What kind of micron filter should I look for post HP pump. I'd like to buy a universal filter so I can use it as an adapter between my 3/8" hard line & 5/16" factory stuff.
What kind of micron filter should I look for post HP pump. I'd like to buy a universal filter so I can use it as an adapter between my 3/8" hard line & 5/16" factory stuff.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." ΓÇô Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
- sykanr0ng
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 405
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:46 am
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
From what I've seen 4 micron max.
"You say overkill like it's a bad thing."
- Gunnibronco
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
4? or 40?
I went with this, since I was ordering AN stuff for my PS/Hydroboost.
http://www.anfittingsdirect.com/an-fitt ... p-269.html
Seems like 10 is the smallest I could find scanning Summit for options. Most were 40, some were 100. I figure anything is better than running nothing.
I went with this, since I was ordering AN stuff for my PS/Hydroboost.
http://www.anfittingsdirect.com/an-fitt ... p-269.html
Seems like 10 is the smallest I could find scanning Summit for options. Most were 40, some were 100. I figure anything is better than running nothing.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." ΓÇô Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
- sykanr0ng
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 405
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:46 am
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
Thread on CB
They said 4, said 10 was still going to let damage causing trash through.
They said 4, said 10 was still going to let damage causing trash through.
"You say overkill like it's a bad thing."
- RJLougee
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 215
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 12:40 pm
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
This is what I'm using on a couple rigs, easy to find the filter almost anywhere and fairly inexpensive:
http://paceperformance.com/i-6679807-pa ... tings.html
This is the part# for the AN6 x 16mm fittings: RUS648060
If you need a different fitting, just make sure the end going into the filter is a ?? to 16mm x 1.5 Male.
Or if adapting the AN6 to rubber hose: SUM-220769B and SUM-220765B
HTH, Joe
http://paceperformance.com/i-6679807-pa ... tings.html
This is the part# for the AN6 x 16mm fittings: RUS648060
If you need a different fitting, just make sure the end going into the filter is a ?? to 16mm x 1.5 Male.
Or if adapting the AN6 to rubber hose: SUM-220769B and SUM-220765B
HTH, Joe
'70 Bronco, MAF 5.0, NP435, D44/9", 4.10s, 33" MT/Rs, PS/PB
'71 Bronco, HP D60, Hi-9, 5.38/ARBs, 101" WB, 408 Stroker, AOD, Atlas, 40" MT/Rs, PiMP EFI.
'78 F150 SWB/Stepside/4WD, 351W/4R100/NP205, 35" KM2s, under const...
'81 Coachman Caper XL MH, 4WD, EFI 460/ZF/BW1356, D44/Sterling, 4.10s/35s, under const...
'83 Bronco, D60/Sterling, 5.13/ARBs, MAF EFI 351W/ZF/BW1356, 37" MT/Rs.
'12 Buggy, HPD60, Hi-9, 4.10s, Explorer 5.0, Atlas 4-speed, my chassis, EB skins.
And the latest project is a '99 Ranger Extra-Cab, custom frame/tube work, on 40s...
'71 Bronco, HP D60, Hi-9, 5.38/ARBs, 101" WB, 408 Stroker, AOD, Atlas, 40" MT/Rs, PiMP EFI.
'78 F150 SWB/Stepside/4WD, 351W/4R100/NP205, 35" KM2s, under const...
'81 Coachman Caper XL MH, 4WD, EFI 460/ZF/BW1356, D44/Sterling, 4.10s/35s, under const...
'83 Bronco, D60/Sterling, 5.13/ARBs, MAF EFI 351W/ZF/BW1356, 37" MT/Rs.
'12 Buggy, HPD60, Hi-9, 4.10s, Explorer 5.0, Atlas 4-speed, my chassis, EB skins.
And the latest project is a '99 Ranger Extra-Cab, custom frame/tube work, on 40s...
- Gunnibronco
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
Thanks, I like the OEM availability. Might pick one up.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." ΓÇô Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
- landshark
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 3942
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:16 pm
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
running that same filter on the 76 and 69... cheap and easy to find.
1976 Bronco "Green, Yellow, whatever", 1969 Bronco "Red", 1972 Bronco Stocker "Kind of Blue/Grayish"
- sykanr0ng
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 405
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:46 am
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
This is where I remember seeing 4 micron:
http://classicbroncos.com/forums/showth ... uel+filter
And these are the 4 micron filters mentioned:
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/wix-33481
http://classicbroncos.com/forums/showth ... uel+filter
And these are the 4 micron filters mentioned:
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/wix-33481
"You say overkill like it's a bad thing."
- Eck
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 2462
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
I am running this after my accumulator and it fits directly to the rubber fuel hose.
http://www.oreillyauto.com/site/c/detai ... &ppt=C0025
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
http://www.oreillyauto.com/site/c/detai ... &ppt=C0025
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
- Gunnibronco
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator
I did some reading after looking at all the info in this thread. It looks like Wix filters are rated to 4 microns, but most other brands don't list a micron rating. Wix 33481 is the equivalent filter to the one RJ Lougee & Landshark are running. So I went ahead and ordered one. I'll put it up in the engine compartment, just before the fuel rails.
Thanks for all the info.
Thanks for all the info.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." ΓÇô Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)