I understand that what your asking price vs. what you actually get may vary a little but is it just me or is this EB priced a little high?
https://denver.craigslist.org/cto/6028462339.html
CL Bronco Posting
- Jesus_man
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 5988
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:36 am
Re: CL Bronco Posting
Yeah, that seems way high priced. A very nice machine tho!!
1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow.
http://www.ucora.org
http://www.ucora.org
- Digger
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 1282
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 7:53 pm
Re: CL Bronco Posting
Maybe it's just me, but builds like this don't impress.
Yes it is shiny, yes it makes lots of power, but that person is charging a lot of money for a vehicle that rides and drives basically just the way it did in 1968.
For $60k, I would want something that outperforms the original design in power, economy, handling, ride, fit/finish and safety.
But that's just me.
Yes it is shiny, yes it makes lots of power, but that person is charging a lot of money for a vehicle that rides and drives basically just the way it did in 1968.
For $60k, I would want something that outperforms the original design in power, economy, handling, ride, fit/finish and safety.
But that's just me.
Cummins R2.8 diesel, ZF5, AtlasII, HP44/BB9, ARBs, coiled / linked suspension, 37" KO2s, full cage, bumpers, etc.
Build Thread: http://www.coloradoclassicbroncos.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5420
Average 23.5 mpg, Best tank: 26.3 mpg
Build Thread: http://www.coloradoclassicbroncos.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=5420
Average 23.5 mpg, Best tank: 26.3 mpg
- Gunnibronco
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Re: CL Bronco Posting
IDK, but personally, I don't like the wave of leather seat, modern amenity, giant motor Broncos coming out. Not that this is exactly a good representation of that, but close. I guess I still want my Bronco to look like a Bronco. If I'm going to spend $60k, I'll get something actually modern, or an original/restored collectible that is really worth $60k. It's good for those who are keeping Broncos stock, because there will be less original or restored to original when (if) the market turns. I still find it strange, but somewhat understandable, that modded, daily drivers are fetching more than original trucks.
Sorry, sort of off topic. But yeah, that's a lot of money for that truck.
Sorry, sort of off topic. But yeah, that's a lot of money for that truck.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." ΓÇô Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
- sykanr0ng
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 405
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:46 am
Re: CL Bronco Posting
If the HP and torque numbers are true what RPM are they at?
Seems awfully high for a 302.
Seems awfully high for a 302.
"You say overkill like it's a bad thing."
-
cravenbronco
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 916
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 4:40 pm
Re: CL Bronco Posting
sykanr0ng wrote:If the HP and torque numbers are true what RPM are they at?
Seems awfully high for a 302.
X2