Justin's retroactive build thread
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Thanks guys! I have no idea if it'll run, but it'll be pretty.
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Opened up my cam this morning to discover this little card with all the cam info on it. Looks like there may not be a single grind for the CR266 part number, as these are different than the numbers I found online. Thoughts on the specs? Was happy to see that the duration was 112 rather than the 109 I'd seen previously. More lift (460 vs. 410) as well.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Viperwolf1
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 9:37 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
No significant difference from the specs I have.
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Cool, thanks.
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Doing work!


- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Found a way to add 2 more horsepower.


- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Making progress.

- crawlercreations
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 8:36 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Looks good! Are those injectors enough? Looks like 17 lb. injectors. I'd think the 351 with the cam you have would need more.
There is a fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Thanks! Yes, I'm running 1999 returnless so the fuel pressure is higher.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
After sitting idle much of the summer due to a recent fishing addiction, I've been picking away at the swap again. Got the pedals converted for the hydraulic clutch and will hopefully have the ZF5 in place tomorrow. Had some shiny good stuff show up in the mail today after a long wait:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Eck
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 2462
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Make sure you test the slave cylinder before driving that ZF home. Would hate for you to get a crappy one like Digger and I both had and have to pull it after install!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
I sprang for a Sachs master and slave after reading about the issues you guys had, so hopefully I'll avoid that.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
- Jesus_man
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 5988
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:36 am
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
What's that? Some sort of underdrive?
1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow.
http://www.ucora.org
http://www.ucora.org
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Yup. NP271 based doubler. Gives an additional 2.72:1 before the transfer case.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Success! A huge thanks to phyler!
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
- crawlercreations
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 8:36 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Looks llllooonnnngggg. Time to stretch and link the rear 

There is a fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
It's actually only about 5 1/2 inches and goes in place of the adapter, so not too bad. But yeah, already an inch back in the rear and will go another 1-2" when the links go in.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
- ZOSO
- Moderator

- Posts: 3910
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:58 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
That the NWFab black box? did you run the 205 or keep the d20? with that underdrive it adds a ton of stress to the d20. make sure to add an HD output.
Rob
74 Ranger EFI351w, 4r70w, ARB 5.13 9in, ARB 5.13D44, and a bunch of other goodies. Best of all the family memories.
04 Mustang Cobra, KenneBell 2.2 feeding a lot of boost on E85. Tire shredding machine
New project: 77 Bronco Ranger, body work and more body work.
Very little left of a 72 durango tan explorer sport
74 Ranger EFI351w, 4r70w, ARB 5.13 9in, ARB 5.13D44, and a bunch of other goodies. Best of all the family memories.
04 Mustang Cobra, KenneBell 2.2 feeding a lot of boost on E85. Tire shredding machine
New project: 77 Bronco Ranger, body work and more body work.
Very little left of a 72 durango tan explorer sport
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Behemoth Drivetrain Shorty. Very similar to the NWFab, but a bunch less money. Took a long time and many emails to get, but the machine work appears really high quality. He keeps the cost down by reusing the guts from existing transfer cases, mostly NP241. Kept the D20. I didn't want to deal with the size of the 205. Thought about using a Dana 300 as a compromise, but they're not really smaller and I'm not a heavy throttle wheeler. I've got a couple of spare stock outputs and plan to carry one, but if I'm breaking them then a HD one will go in.
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Progress! Rebuilding the D20 was easier than I'd anticipated. Many thanks to Digger for turning down the output shaft of the doubler. Still working with the vendor to get a proper replacement, but I'll keep that as a spare unless the machining looks way better. Been picking away at the smaller tasks too. Need to decide if I'm going to run the current NWP 23 gallon tank and modify it to accept the '99 Mountaineer sending unit or spring for a new tank that's easier to retrofit. Will need a new tank at some point anyway to make room to push the rear axle further back, but don't really have the spare $$ right now for it.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Jesus_man
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 5988
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:36 am
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Justin wrote: Will need a new tank at some point anyway to make room to push the rear axle further back, but don't really have the spare $$ right now for it.
We should talk about this if you decide on a new one. I've been in contact with Aero and I think I have a design that will allow the rear axle to be pushed back 2-3" and still have a fair amount of fuel capacity. I need to CAD it up, but perhaps if we order two, they might give us a better deal. $$ isn't flush here either. but I need a new tank someday as well.
1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow.
http://www.ucora.org
http://www.ucora.org
- Strike2
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:34 am
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
In the next several months I'll be needing to ordering a tank from Aero as well, I think my axles is 5-6" back? hoping for around 17 gallons and not have the tank hang as low as their design. Here is a quick drawing of what I came up with a while back without mounting hardware or skid plate.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Jesus_man
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 5988
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:36 am
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
You shortened the 16.5" to 13.5" and also the 14.5" high to 13". That would help.
I was thinking to leave the plan view essentially the same, shorten the height by 2", but make a c-shape cutout in the front of the tank where the pumpkin wants to be. The overall height of mine is 13-1/8". Overall length is 22-5/8" and width is also 22-5/8". Also, my sender isn't countersunk, but the tank has nubs on top to protect the wiring. I have not done any volume calculations, but it should still be pretty close to 20 gal.
I was thinking to leave the plan view essentially the same, shorten the height by 2", but make a c-shape cutout in the front of the tank where the pumpkin wants to be. The overall height of mine is 13-1/8". Overall length is 22-5/8" and width is also 22-5/8". Also, my sender isn't countersunk, but the tank has nubs on top to protect the wiring. I have not done any volume calculations, but it should still be pretty close to 20 gal.
1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow.
http://www.ucora.org
http://www.ucora.org
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
I'd be open to putting together a group buy if we can agree on a design. If nothing else, we'd probably save some shipping cost. I'd like one that can fit (or be modified to fit) the stock explorer sending unit.
- Gunnibronco
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
I had mine built about 3" shallower than their normal tank, no other mods (about 19 gallons). I've moved it back even with the end of the frame. I had to cut & fold some sheet metal & add hangers to the rear of the frame crossmembers. I've moved my rear axle back 3.25", and my tank is a little close the pumpkin. It won't surprise me if there is a little interference on full compression. If there is too much interference, I might spring for one like JD's talking about with a pre-clearanced area for the pumpkin.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." ΓÇô Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, HP609s, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, 4x4x2 hyrdo assist, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Cool, thanks. I'm tempted to just build one.
- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
More progress....

- Justin
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 6199
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
So, I was going to try to be sneaky and roll into the Platte get-together in my freshly re-powered Bronco. Since Garry is awesome, he spent the afternoon helping me finish up the last of the wiring and working a few bugs out. Fired the engine, which ran...badly. Something is up. The cooling system is pressurizing. With the plugs removed, a little coolant is spraying out of the #6 cylinder. I though the #5 plug came out wet, but may have been mistaken about which one it was. Thoughts? Bad head gasket install? Cracked block? Any help is appreciated.
On the upside, I fired my engine today.
On the upside, I fired my engine today.
- Jesus_man
- Official CCB Member

- Posts: 5988
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:36 am
Re: Justin's retroactive build thread
Sorry Justin. That is heartbreaking! We found a leak in the head of my freshly rebuilt engine and it was deflating. We used a product to seal up the crack (a coolant treatment) and I haven't had any issues with leaks in 2 years, but it sounds like yours is a bit more serious than mine was.
1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow.
http://www.ucora.org
http://www.ucora.org
